The King in a Queue: How Prabhas’s Scheduling Chaos Threatens to Topple His Pan-India Empire
Pan-India superstar Prabhas is reportedly caught in a self-made scheduling crisis, with a ‘never-ending queue’ of film commitments creating chaos for directors and producers.,The situation has reached a boiling point with director Sandeep Vanga reportedly issuing an ultimatum: Prabhas must work exclusively on their film ‘Spirit’, sidelining all other projects.,This demand has put a potential collaboration with ‘Amaran’ director Rajkumar Periasamy in jeopardy, leading to industry whispers of ‘another director falls’ victim to the actor’s chaotic schedule.,Critics point to a pattern of ‘poor planning,’ citing the controversial film ‘Adipurush’ and reports of another project suffering from a 4+ hour cut and a ‘depressed producer’ as evidence of a systemic problem.
In the high-stakes world of Indian cinema, Prabhas is a king. After the monolithic success of the ‘Baahubali’ saga, he was crowned the nation’s first true pan-India superstar, a titan whose name alone could guarantee colossal openings from Mumbai to Madurai. But the crown is weighing heavy, and the throne is looking increasingly unstable. The actor, once a symbol of cinematic grandeur, is now the protagonist of a cautionary tale, a story of ambition, over-commitment, and a logistical nightmare so severe it threatens to derail his entire empire. The industry is buzzing with a single, damning phrase: Prabhas’s ‘never-ending queue’.
This isn’t just about a busy schedule; it’s about a pile-up of projects so chaotic that it has begun to claim victims. The latest casualty in this scheduling war is reportedly director Rajkumar Periasamy, whose anticipated collaboration with the star is now on the brink of collapse. The reason? A stunning ultimatum allegedly delivered by Sandeep Vanga, the maverick director of ‘Arjun Reddy’ and ‘Animal’. According to explosive reports circulating since early July, Vanga has drawn a line in the sand, insisting that Prabhas dedicate his time exclusively to their upcoming magnum opus, ‘Spirit’. No distractions. No side projects. The message is clear: Vanga’s film is the priority, and everything else must wait or be discarded.
The Ultimatum That Shook Tollywood
For any other star, a packed schedule is a sign of success. For Prabhas, it has become a liability. The ‘never-ending queue’ includes the futuristic sci-fi epic ‘Kalki’ and now, the all-consuming ‘Spirit’. Vanga’s demand, if true, represents a power play of immense proportions. He is essentially asking a producer’s darling to halt the multi-crore machinery that revolves around him, forcing a hard reset on a slate of films that have been in the pipeline for years. This is not a polite request; it’s a strategic move to seize control of the star’s most valuable asset: his time.
The immediate collateral damage appears to be the potential film with Rajkumar Periasamy, the acclaimed director of ‘Amaran’. While the project was never officially announced, the industry was rife with speculation about a partnership that could have blended Prabhas’s star power with Periasamy’s nuanced direction. Now, that possibility is fading. The headline ‘Another Director Falls?’ has become a recurring theme in reports from M9.news, suggesting Periasamy is not the first to be left in the lurch by the actor’s unmanageable commitments. This revolving door of directors and deferred projects paints a picture of an artist who is spreading himself too thin, making promises his calendar cannot keep.
A Pattern of Poor Planning and Production Nightmares
This crisis did not emerge from a vacuum. Skeptics and industry insiders argue that the warning signs have been flashing for years, a clear pattern of what one report bluntly calls ‘poor planning.’ The most glaring example cited is the disastrous 2023 film ‘Adipurush’. The film was a critical and commercial debacle, but the post-mortem analysis from industry critics goes beyond the film’s quality. A scathing report from July 4, 2025, directly lays the blame on Prabhas for his choices, noting that ‘he made Adipurush with a second grade director like Om Raut.’ This harsh assessment points to a perceived lack of judgment in the star’s selection of projects and collaborators, a willingness to sign on to films without the necessary due diligence.
The chaos extends beyond casting choices and into the very fabric of production. A disturbing report from June 12, 2025, paints a grim picture of another one of his unnamed projects. The story speaks of a ‘producer depressed’ and a ‘hero who lost interest.’ The most shocking detail? The film’s final cut was ballooning to an unwatchable length of ‘more than 4 hours 15 minutes.’ While the project is not named, its association with the narrative surrounding Prabhas suggests it is another symptom of the same disease: a lack of oversight and control. When a film’s runtime spirals out of control and its producer is left in despair, it signals a fundamental breakdown in the filmmaking process, a breakdown that seems to be happening with alarming frequency in Prabhas’s orbit.
The combination of questionable director choices, on-set issues, and now a public scheduling standoff creates a toxic cocktail. It raises a critical question that stakeholders, from producers to distributors, must be asking: Is the king losing control of his kingdom? The ‘never-ending queue’ is no longer a symbol of his demand, but a symbol of his disarray. It suggests a star pulled in too many directions, unable to give any single project the focus it requires, leading to compromised quality, frayed relationships, and financial turmoil for those who bet on him. For an industry that runs on reliability and trust, this is a dangerous reputation to acquire.